ENGLISH
ENGLISH
07.02.2022

Cleaning the atmosphere

Weak points in modern-day corporate email security
Ilya Pomerantsev
Product Analyst, Network Security Department
One of the signs of our time is that businesses integrate cloud solutions offered by giants such as Google and Microsoft, often relying on built-in security systems. In some cases — if the budget allows — standard security tools are upgraded with anti-spam systems, traditional sandboxes, and cloud antivirus software. Despite the impressive array of solutions, however, corporate email still remains one of the key entry points for threat actors.
In 26% of incidents investigated by Group-IB's Digital Forensics Lab, company infrastructure was infected with ransomware through phishing links. According to Verizon, most malware is still delivered by email, with 46% of companies having been attacked almost exclusively via email in 2020, while social engineering was conducted via email 96% of the time.
With so many companies and organizations having sped up adopting remote work practices recently, the situation is bound to worsen. Many people still work on personal devices such as laptops and smartphones, which often lack even the most basic security tools and operating system updates.


This article looks at three real-life attacks attempted via corporate email, all of which were detected and stopped by Group-IB's Business Email Protection (formerly known as Group-IB Atmosphere). The attacks serve as a good example of how threat actors skillfully exploit weaknesses in the current approach to email security. In this regard, properly built corporate email security is obviously the first line of cyber defense for organizations.

Case 1: Bypassing sender verification

When security systems analyze large amounts of email correspondence, the initial step normally involves filtering based on sender verification. Strict filtering policies are usually in place to address most ways of delivering malware via email.

If an email contains a password-protected archive, for example, it does not matter how cleverly the key is specified — the email will not be delivered. Malware distributed as executable files, scripts, attached emails, and HTML documents is handled similarly. Such emails will not be delivered, regardless of the file status.

This means that the task of built-in sandboxes comes down to filtering emails that contain office documents. At the same time, email domains of major corporations, solutions providers, and government entities are considered safe — provided they have passed sender address verification — which is why most emails from them are delivered without additional analysis. In the case described below, this is exactly what the hackers took advantage of.
On September 11, 2021, Group-IB's Business Email Protection detected a malicious phishing mailout targeted at a major Russian organization (a non-governmental association of entrepreneurs).
The sender and recipient addresses belonged to the same organization. An analysis of the email did not reveal that its headers had been forged, which could have suggested that the sender had been compromised.
    The analysis revealed that the email had been sent through a feedback form on the organization's official website. It is noteworthy that cybercriminals used the feedback form in Russian to target the employees of the organization's English-speaking division.
      As payload, the email contained a modular banking Trojan called TrickBot. Threat actors use the Trojan as a foothold at the vulnerability post-exploitation stage. For example, the group Wizzard Spider used Trickbot as a substitute for Cobalt Strike in early attack stages.
        This type of attack requires manual labor, preliminary research into the potential victim, resources, and time. As a result, such campaigns are targeted and sophisticated rather than mass-scale. The case in question is not unique, however.

        The case reveals weaknesses in email security systems where the load is reduced by sender verification. If the solution that your organization uses includes an anti-spam system, we strongly recommend testing it against the infection vector described above.

        Case 2: Bypassing security by using an attachment in a non-standard file format

        In typical email security systems, the next step after sender verification is checking the format of the attached files. Here too the security approach stems from business processes where receiving a password-protected archive or executable file attached to the email is an anomaly most of the time.

        Receiving emails with files that the security system does not recognize, however, is considered not to pose a threat. Such files are meant to be opened with specific software used within the target organization.

        As it is shown in the example below, however, this creates opportunities for threat actors, who in this case decided to use an exploit in a regular Windows Help file.
        The initial file was designed to use multiple stagers to deliver the TrueBot Trojan (also known as Silence.Downloader) to the target endpoint. The threat group Silence is known for using the Trojan.

        Group-IB's Business Email Protection identified the payload and attributed the threat to the group Silence. From 2016, the group attacked financial organizations mainly in Russia, but in 2018 it expanded its geography and started attacking financial organizations worldwide. The Silence APT group is now thought to have joined a RaaS program.

        Case 3: Bypassing a sandbox using an office document

        As mentioned at the beginning of this article, even when strict filtering policies are in place, businesses rely on cloud antivirus software and sandboxes to analyze office documents because they cannot stop the documents from being circulated.

        After checks by cloud antivirus solutions, which are not particularly effective against new types of threats, the sender's document is sent to a sandbox for analysis. However, most security vendors do not focus enough on countering known ways of bypassing sandboxes.
        Sandbox evasion techniques can be divided into three major categories:
        1
        Threat actors detecting virtual environments
        2
        Playing with time (for example, delayed execution): ensuring that the payload is not launched when it is being analyzed
        3
        Specific actions expected from users
        In the case in question, the threat actors used techniques pertaining to the last category. The initial file was a PPT presentation that contained three macros.

        This is what the file structure looked like in Group-IB's Business Email Protection:

        Most sandboxes that analyze such attachments in corporate email launch the file and wait for suspicious activity.

        Let's imagine that a regular human user has opened an office document and is facing the following situation:
          They will most likely close the window assuming that the file is damaged. This response is not typical for security systems. Let's now look at one of the three macros contained in this document:
            The threat actors adjusted their malicious activity to fit actions typical for people rather than machines. In this situation, most typical sandboxes wait until the analysis time is over and then mark the file as "safe" without detecting anything suspicious.

            The attack was conducted by a Nigerian group called TMT (also known as SilverTerrier), which focused on business email compromise (BEC). Emails in such attacks are often disguised as commercial proposals, requests for money transfers, or messages from an HR department. The goal is to withdraw funds or steal confidential data. You can learn more about the group here.

              Is my email secure or are there holes in the security system?

              The cases described above are just specific examples, but even they reveal fundamental weaknesses in most modern-day corporate email security systems. There are even more ways to deliver malware to end users, however.

              Companies usually do not have sufficient resources to compile a comprehensive list of scenarios for internal audits. With this in mind, we created a free automated email security testing system called Group-IB Trebuchet.
                Is there a way in?
                Test your email security
                Access your current email security posture with 40+ real life attack scenarios. See how many of those will land in your inbox.
                About the test:
                It's free. Absolutely free.
                We do not harvest your data. Highlights about the test are available here.
                All you need is a separate mailbox within your corporate domain.
                Trebuchet will send 40+ test emails modeled on current real-life attack scenarios to that address (after it has been confirmed that the account belongs to you).
                Three scenarios are described in this article; the others are also based on real-life attacks as well as on our experience in responding to incidents and cybercrime investigations.
                The test scenarios include two types of attacks: both common attacks and highly sophisticated ones that our customers had to deal with.
                Your system will be tested in a mode imitating the attack one to get the most accurate assessment of your email security. All attachments are delivered in a modified form; for instance, the malware does not communicate with command-and-control servers. Nevertheless, we do not recommend downloading or launching the test samples.
                Any test email delivered to the mailbox specified, which would mean that it has bypassed your security tools, would be a clear sign that your corporate email security has serious flaws.


                If such emails are delivered to your mailbox, we recommend reaching out to Group-IB specialists.

                Hunt for the most advanced email threats